Would it not be good if rule engines were standardized?

🤔Would it not be good if rule engines were standardized?

Really… The benefits of that would be massive:
* No proprietary languages and modeling
* Business and IT standard language
* Easier and quicker adoption
* Minimize learning curve
* No vendor lock-in

This is not like a fancy world that I'm thinking about. NO!

💡Decision Model and Notation (DMN) is an open standard for decision modeling and business rules.

That means if you have a rule engine that supports DMN, it is the standard for the business rule engine or BRE. #businessrules #bre

💫Decision Model and Notation (DMN) is not just a fancy word. Since 2015, the Object Management Group (OMG) has accepted and published the notation, guidelines, schema, examples, and other related resources regarding business decisions and business rules “modeling” and “execution”.

💣Yes, it is not just modeling, DMN also has several conformance levels. DMN Conformance Level 3 is what you need to look for executable models in DMN.

Finding the right standard rule engine is always hard though, especially if your tech stack is not in Java, as most of the standard implementations are in #JAVA #J2E.

The .Net Core is a modern, innovative, open-source development platform, and developers love it. Based on #StackOverflow survey 2019, 2020 and 2021 it was the #1 most-loved framework. Even the latest survey of 2024 shows .net's core popularity as the development stack for enterprise solutions on both the front end and back end. #dotnet #csharp #backend #frontend

But there is no pure .net core rule engine with Decision Model and Notation (DMN) Conformance Level 3!

🚀This was correct until last week. We FlexRule just released the first and only available .Net DMN Rule Engine with Conformance Level 3 as part of our Open Decision Intelligence Platform. #decisionintelligence #OpenDIP

Learn more how DMN can help you at here.

Posted here.

Published August 12th, 2024 at 07:30 am